A migration project plan should make uncertainty visible early. The work is easier to control when each evidence gate has a clear purpose: discover what exists, decide how it maps, validate before production, execute in dependency order, reconcile the result, and obtain explicit business verification.
Phase 1: discovery
Capture source objects, fields, relationships, owners, lifecycle states, customizations, data volumes, and known exceptions. Discovery creates the factual baseline for planning and prevents undocumented structures from appearing during production execution.
Phase 2: mapping and decisions
Classify mappings as direct, transformed, review-required, or no-equivalent. Record the decision and evidence for each non-trivial mapping so the project does not depend on undocumented assumptions held by one person.
Key takeaway: The useful test is whether the process preserves business meaning, ownership, evidence, and the ability to verify what happened. A faster handoff is not enough if those controls disappear.
Phase 3: staged execution
Validate mapped records away from production, then execute writes in the order required by dependencies. Organizations may need to exist before contacts, contacts before activities, and owners before records that reference them.
Phase 4: reconciliation and handover
Compare source and destination counts, relationships, ownership, unresolved records, and any financial or operational totals that matter. The project should close only after the result is reviewed and accepted by an authorized person.
Practical checklist
- Discovery scope
- Mapping ownership
- Ambiguity review
- Staging criteria
- Execution dependencies
- Checkpoint and retry plan
- Reconciliation rules
- Exception report
- Business sign-off
See the connected product context
This guide targets a narrow operating problem. The related Infrakinetic capability page shows how that problem connects to the wider product architecture and adjacent workflows.
Explore the related capability